Cash & Liquidity Management

Page 1 of 2

Pioneering a New Era of Centralisation Centralisation of treasury activities has often been key to the transforming treasury's profile from a relatively isolated function within the business to a leading role in devising and delivering on the company’s strategic plans.

Pioneering a New Era of Centralisation

by Gunnar Berger, Head of Cash Management Solutions, Nordea

The concept, role and profile of treasury have evolved immeasurably over recent years, and many treasurers have transformed their profile from a relatively isolated function within the business to a leading role in devising and delivering on the company’s strategic plans. Centralisation of treasury activities has often been key to this transformation. Many large multinational corporations centralised core functions such as liquidity and risk management some years ago, and are now looking at new ways of adding value. Others, particularly smaller companies, have embarked on centralisation initiatives more recently.

A diversity of objectives

While the financial crisis has been a trigger for more recent centralisation projects, centralisation has been a trend for a number of years. Furthermore, the drivers and objectives of centralisation are often complex and multifaceted, as the participants in our Executive Panel in this Guide discuss.

Achieving visibility and control over liquidity and risk are typically treasurers’ primary centralisation objectives. Without a single, consistent view over balances, flows, exposures and future financial obligations, it is impossible for treasurers to manage the company’s liquidity requirements and mitigate risk exposures effectively.

Centralisation can also bring cost savings. If treasury is undertaken locally by each business unit, bank relationships, technology and expertise need to be established locally. By centralising treasury, multiple systems can be replaced with a single treasury technology infrastructure, reducing costs and maintenance requirements. Skills can be rationalised, with a greater emphasis on specialist treasury expertise as opposed to transaction processing, enabling treasury to contribute more proactively to business strategy. By centralising and streamlining bank relationships, greater economies of scale can be achieved, potentially reducing bank charges, bank connectivity can be simplified and the cost of managing bank relationships lowered.

Control and compliance is considerably easier as by centralising the treasury function, processes can be standardised across the business, allowing for more consistent controls and greater efficiency.

An evolving trend

Championed by the initial ‘early adopters’, typically large multinational corporations, treasury centralisation is now a proven means of enhancing both financial and operational efficiency, adopted by a wide spectrum of companies across all industries, as Sandvik, Metsä, Grundfos and Paros’ experiences illustrate in this Guide. The trend has not stopped at liquidity and risk management, however, nor at large multinationals.

Firstly, treasurers and finance managers who have already demonstrated the benefits of centralisation are now seeking to extend these advantages to financial activities such as payables and receivables in order to optimise working capital, as our Executive Panel discussion in this Guide demonstrates.

Secondly, smaller companies’ treasury needs are becoming more complex as they expand their geographic footprint through organic growth, mergers and acquisitions. In many cases, the speed and nature of this growth has resulted in a fragmented approach to cash and treasury management. Consequently, these companies are now seeking to centralise liquidity and risk in order to leverage the same benefits as their larger peers.

Enablers of transformation

Technology is a vital enabler, both for companies seeking to centralise cash, treasury and risk management activities for the first time, and those that are seeking to extend the benefits of centralisation further. The challenge for smaller companies embarking on a centralisation journey is that the technology tools on which larger companies have relied are often out of reach, with lower budgets and access to fewer resources. Consequently, there is growing demand for lower-cost, more convenient delivery mechanisms to facilitate centralisation and greater visibility and efficiency in cash, treasury and risk management. Newer technology, such as cloud-based architecture, is leading to the growth of ‘plug and play’ and self-service models are instrumental in achieving this, and we see considerable achievements already being made in these areas, with significant potential still to come.

It is not only smaller companies that are benefitting from these emerging technologies. Treasurers of all sizes of company that are extending centralisation into working capital functions such as payables and receivables are also seeking to do so more easily and cost-effectively. While in the past, many centralised treasury functions had to maintain considerable expertise in IT, technology innovation and simplified deployment models mean that treasurers are able to focus on managing business-critical financial decision-making rather than the processes and transactions that underpin them.

Next Page   2 

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Discover the benefits of myTMI

 Download this article for free