Risk Management
Published  2 MIN READ
Please note: this article is over 7 years old. If you feel this article is inaccurate or contains errors get in touch here . Many thanks, TMI

Corporate Treasurers Dodge an Unintended Bullet

by Abel Clark, Managing Director, Financial, Thomson Reuters

Abel ClarkAbel Clark, Managing Director, Financial, Thomson Reuters, looks at the significance of recent changes to the MiFID II text that clear the path for corporates hedging on regulated platforms.

Although not widely reported, this month saw a significant change to the MiFID II text that had been causing rumblings across the corporate treasury industry for some time. On May 2, MiFID II regulators confirmed the removal of non-financial corporates hedging on authorized platforms from MiFID II obligations which is a significant step forward for fair and efficient derivatives markets.

Prior to this move, corporates accessing multi-dealer platforms to undertake hedging activity, either directly or via direct electronic access carried a requirement to be an authorised financial firm. For non-financial firms, authorisation would have had a severe effect on their balance sheets as they would have been subject to the capital requirements in Basel III. In addition they would have become classed as financial counterparties under the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), and therefore subject to the full panoply of requirements such as the clearing mandates and bilateral margining.

A number of industry participants expressed their concern regarding this situation, indeed you will have seen reported on these very pages that the European Association of Corporate Treasurers wrote an open letter to Marcus Ferber in February clearly stating the industry’s concerns. To effect change, the industry needed a strong and clear voice and Thomson Reuters led discussions for some time with the European Commission, the Parliament, and the member states to present a clear argument for this change – and they have listened. MiFID II and Basel obligations would have seen those firms exiting regulated trading venues, impairing their ability to hedge effectively and significantly increasing their cost of capital. Together we have ensured that MiFID II is once again in line with the G20 goal of moving OTC trading onto authorised platforms.

Related Articles

Risk Management
Risky Business

Outlook on Corporate Credit Quality Following a year of economic growth concerns, sticky core inflation, increasing interest rates, and a rash of bank failures, treasurers have been acting as corporate risk...

Risk Management
How to Write a Robust Treasury Policy and Limit Unwanted Outcomes

Treasury policy is the executive mandate to the treasurer, as custodian of financial risk. This in-depth yet accessible guide explains how to get it right.

Risk Management
Stronger Together

Nicolas Trimbour BNP Paribas) and Laurent Sarrat (Sis ID) highlight the greatest cyber and fraud threats confronting organisations today, together with best practices to avoid being compromised.

Risk Management
Mission Intelligence

Two industry experts offer an in-depth examination of AIs potential uses for risk management.

Risk Management
Don’t Forget to Breathe!

Natasha Condon and Martijn Stoker explain how corporate treasury teams can manage ongoing uncertainty in 2023.

Risk Management
Taking the Guesswork Out of Liquidity Buffers

Is there a more effective means of calculating and holding buffers while keeping risk under control?

Risk Management
Transfer Pricing for Treasurers: Navigating the Pitfalls

This article highlights some of the hurdles that treasurers must negotiate when designing and implementing tax transfer pricing policies.

Risk Management
Ports in a Storm

TMI asks whether today’s data-driven world has added to the challenge of counteryparty risk management or offers the ultimate solution to mitigating it.

©2024 P4Publishing Limited All rights reserved. Registered in England & Wales No. 5838515