International Payments in Asia: Far from Harmonious

Published: October 07, 2014

International Payments in Asia: Far from Harmonious
Wim Grosemans picture
Wim Grosemans
Head of Product Management, Payments and Receivables, Cash Management, BNP Paribas

by Wim Grosemans, Head of Product Management International Payments - Cash Management, BNP Paribas

Looking East, an international sales director might picture the land of milk and honey, while a treasury executive will see a promising yet complex patchwork. While the two will marvel at growth drawing near, the cash expert will soon endure the strains of a heterogeneous market. This article explores the multiple challenges of payments in Asia.

Because of Asia’s outstanding growth and potential, corporates are eager to adapt to local requirements. To do this, they must know what is expected of them. Yet this is far from simple, as there is no such thing as a homogeneous payment market in Asia. Instead, what we find is a mix of regulated and restricted countries, in addition to a select few countries operating much like in the West. As a result, a European treasurer setting out to conquer Asia faces a serious challenge. While the sales or operation managers can foresee a consistent development of their activity across the continent, he or she is confronted with a veritable patchwork, with almost as many currencies and rules as languages.

To make things more complex, regulations may change rapidly in Asia, with some countries facing political instability. Remaining alert is essential – take China, for instance, where key developments to come will change the local clearing system (CNAPS2).

Playing by the rules

Non-convertible currencies: Go local!

Let’s first focus on countries with non-convertible currencies, such as Vietnam or South Korea. Sending funds and changing them into a local currency is feasible if the local requirements are respected. In practice, most businesses will rely on a well-established bank to transfer their funds to closed markets. But then again, if the customer experience is relatively simple, processing the transfers is more complex. It is likely that the bank will use a strong currency like the euro or the US dollar to make a payment from Europe to a local Vietnamese or South Korean bank.

As a next step, the local bank sends the payment in a local currency to the beneficiary’s bank. Solid expertise is required to manage the foreign exchange risk, but it also requires a holistic operational approach to comply with the local rules and monitor the entire payment chain. This can be time-consuming, as it takes up to seven days for the funds to reach the beneficiary. In the case of recurring operations, however, corporates can plan ahead and optimise the time spent.

Semi-regulated countries: simpler, but not simple

The second challenge treasurers face is transferring funds in a local currency to semi-regulated countries, such as India, China, or Thailand (typically, the larger countries). Although strict conditions apply, these markets offer a more liquid access to currency. Although the Indian rupee is partially convertible (it can be exchanged under strict conditions), making a payment in India remains complex. Transfers to India are subject to challenging procedures, and failure to comply can lead to payments being stopped or returned.

In India, a payment order must specify if the settlement is made as a down payment or for the total amount of a given transaction. Some banks require the telephone numbers of the beneficiary for any transfer, so European businesses have no choice but to adapt their procedures in order to meet Indian requirements.[[[PAGE]]]

Limited options to repatriate funds

The third challenge corporates face is repatriating funds. Businesses operating locally may find their options are a bit limited. For example, in Vietnam, it is difficult to repatriate funds to Europe in euros or dollars, and it is impossible to do it in local currency since it’s non-convertible. Solutions do exist, but while some only bring a few restrictions, others lead to many.

In moderately regulated markets, such as Thailand, domestic pooling is allowed, while cross-border activities are restricted due to the convertibility of the currency. In more heavily-regulated markets, however, local solutions are the only available option and corporates must comply with very strict requirements.

Good to knw

Connecting the dots

It might seem obvious, but it is best to rely on a well-established local bank. It is a challenge to balance the local regulatory and administrative requirements while ensuring the correct payment formats in the back office.

BNP Paribas recently helped a corporate close an acquisition deal in China. The company needed special authorisations to conduct the operation, as it is under the responsibility of the Foreign Direct Investment (documentation from the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, or MOFCOM). Additionally, the payment was very sensitive because it required three transfers in renminbi (RMB) to three different business owners. Such transactions are usually not authorised by the People’s Bank of China and the SAFE (State Administration of Foreign Exchange). BNP Paribas had to set up very specific procedures to align the entire transaction process, from validation to clearing. The pressure was incredibly high, since the funds had to be available precisely when the agreement was to be signed.

Looking like Europe

Deregulated countries, such as Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Hong Kong are much less of a challenge. Their payment systems are very similar to what we have in Europe, with free currencies and simple rules. In these countries, corporates usually manage their foreign exchange risk directly and centrally, as it can be quite substantial.

But even if the whole payment process is skilfully managed, Asia is not Europe. Transfers in yen or Singaporean dollars to Europe are not subject to European rules, nor are they protected by  Europe’s Payment Services Directive (PSD), as the regulation only covers operations carried out in European currencies within the European Economic Area. Additionally, the time required to complete an operation is not regulated, which means corporates might have to support extra costs as a result of extended value dates. Relying on a banking partner that closely monitors its correspondent banks is an asset.

To be frank, we are still a long way from the single Asian payment market that international treasurers dream of. Despite the Hong Kong-based US dollar clearing system, the dollar is not king in Asia. Many would rather have the RMB as Asia’s reference currency, but the RMB is not quite there yet.

Wim Grosemans

Sign up for free to read the full article

Article Last Updated: May 07, 2024

Related Content