by Jean-François Garneau, Director, Head of Financial Risk Management, Bombardier Transportation, Zürich
Some people think that risk management decisions are concerned with what happens up to and until a trade is executed, while hedge accounting ones are concerned with what happens post-trade, i.e., once a trade is on our books. This amalgamation of the distinction between risk management and hedge accounting with that between the pre-trade and post-trade occurrence of the decision can only be maintained as long as the size of one’s financial risk is not too high. The minute financial risk becomes significant, the accounting consequences of risk management start to matter tremendously, making it advisable that the risk management function be greatly involved in the set-up of the hedge accounting framework of the firm, and that hedge accounting specialists are called in whenever risk management decisions involve potential hedge accounting issues.
The better distinction to make is therefore not between a pre-trade risk management function divorced from hedge accounting and a post-trade hedge accounting function divorced from risk management, but between (i) a pre-trade decision-making process, where discretionary decisions can still be made with regard to both risk management and hedge accounting, and (ii) a post-trade decision-making process, which is almost entirely governed by the risk management decisions and hedge accounting set-up decided before the trade was executed. In this article, we would like to share with you four of the risk management and hedge accounting considerations that went into the set-up of our post-trade hedge accounting framework, with the hope that some of those insights could help you optimise your own post-trade set-up.
First consideration: Should you account for your derivatives as fair value hedges or as cash flow hedges? The answer depends in part on the sort of flows you are trying to hedge. This is because fair value hedge accounting can only be applied to firm commitments (i.e., to committed sales or purchase transactions with third parties). However, because cash flow hedge accounting can be applied to most sorts of flows whereas fair value hedge accounting cannot, we and many of the companies we benchmarked have preferred to deny ourselves the opportunity to use fair value hedge accounting. This has enabled us to keep our hedge accounting set-up as simple as possible (one rule for all) in addition to aligning us with the forecasts most experts make with regard to the disappearance of fair value hedge accounting as an option within the revised international hedge accounting standards.
Sign up for free to read the full articleRegister Login with LinkedIn
Already have an account?Login
Download our Free Treasury App for mobile and tablet to read articles – no log in required.Download Version Download Version