Risk Management
Published  9 MIN READ
Please note: this article is over 13 years old. If you feel this article is inaccurate or contains errors get in touch here . Many thanks, TMI

A Statistical Approach to Receivables Risk

by Helen Sanders, Editor

The evolution in the role of treasury is a perennial feature in industry conference programmes and seminars. For a number of years now, we have seen a gradual expansion of treasurers’ responsibility as they influence the elements that contribute to the financial supply chain, such as payables, trade finance and supply chain finance. In some cases, such as payables, the actual payment processing may take place in a separate shared service centre, but treasury takes ownership of issues such as bank relationships, bank connectivity and payment timing as part of a wider working capital responsibility. However, the area that is more difficult for treasurers to influence is collections, which is typically closer to the business and often less centralised. Achieving oversight and influence over collections at a strategic level, if not necessarily taking full operational responsibility, potentially has a far greater impact on the treasurer’s ability to manage working capital than payables. This article looks at some of the most recent developments in credit and collections management, specifically risk-based collections, and how these techniques contribute to an effective liquidity and working capital strategy.

Receivables metrics

The trade receivables portfolio is, for many companies, the first or second largest asset on their balance sheets and in the same way as any other asset, it makes sense to take care of it. Collections delinquency has a major impact on companies’ ability to forecast cash and manage working capital effectively. Uncertainty about when a customer will pay an invoice results in treasurers having to create large working capital ‘cushions’ which sit on the balance sheet providing little value to the company. Companies have developed sophisticated models to determine the probability of customer payment based on customer segmentation and historical data which they use to calculate the size of these cash cushions. In addition, many organisations have developed efficient collection procedures with automated payment reminders and dedicated collections professionals calling customers to remind them to pay. Despite the automation and sophistication of these techniques, being proactive in chasing payment is only one part of a credible collections management strategy. Assigning probability of non-payment for cash flow forecasting is also important, but neither technique contributes to reducing the incidence of late payment.

Invoice ageing is typically the metric used most frequently to determine receivables risk, with specific actions such as chasing invoices or referring amounts to a collection agency. However, using ageing alone as a way of measuring and addressing collections is effectively closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Far better is to allocate credit limits, and decide on appropriate collection processes based on intelligence about customer behaviour. Indeed, it seems ludicrous that pre- and post-sale processes are often so poorly aligned. For example, having a reliable understanding of the customer risk profile can inform the way that the sales team work with a customer, and how they prioritise their focus on different customer groups. At the other end of the process, automated, timely reconciliation and posting of collections is vital to free up credit limits for lower risk customers to enable the company to do more business with them.

As companies start to centralise their collections and standardise their use of technology, they are increasingly able to leverage the benefits of proactive credit scoring techniques.