by François Masquelier, Head of Corporate Finance and Treasury, RTL Group, and Honorary Chairman, ATEL
This article describes the main key proposals made by the IASB in London for financial instruments hedge accounting. Is this third and last act of IAS 39 revamping a revolution or a simple reform of existing principles? Hedge accounting has always been a controversial topic. Are these new proposed measures acceptable for corporate treasurers? Sometimes, adjustments could be better than a complete reform of basic rules. The convergence with US GAAP should remain a critical issue for IASB in coming months.
Third and final part of IFRS 9
The corporate treasurers in Europe were impatiently waiting for the third part of IFRS 9 (www.iasb.org). Eventually, this lengthy tripartite process of IFRS 9 was as long as an elephant’s gestation. The IASB based in London has recently issued a third Exposure Draft (ED – released on 9 December 2010 for comments by 9 March 2011) on proposals to replace the hedge accounting requirements previously defined in the famous and controversial IAS 39 Financial Instruments Recognition & Measurement. Unquestionably no single treasurer could dare to pretend that IAS 39 is/was not highly complex and inaccurate on different items. It has long been an area of difficulties for both preparers (companies applying IFRS/IAS standards) and users (investors using these financial reports under IAS/IFRS). After G20 in London, IASB wanted more than ever to improve the information available for investors. This explains why it decided to revisit IAS 39 in depth. However, after this third part of the IFRS 9 Exposure Draft trilogy, it is doubtful whether the initial goal of completely revamping IAS 39 has been achieved. We could consider that IASB has proposed an interim consensual solution with amendments on existing rules, more than a comprehensive reform of financial instruments (hedge) accounting model.
In short, hedge accounting rules concern the reporting of derivative instruments used by a company to hedge its exposures to financial risks which could potentially affect its business. The general treatment of such derivative products is to measure it at fair value with changes being reported to gains and losses in the income statement,unless the hedge accounting exception applies. This exception is needed to faithfully represent the activity of a company which intends to protect and hedge a defined exposure. IASB has always considered the cost basis for derivatives would be inappropriate for measuring their (current) value.
Struggle to understand IAS 39 reporting
The criticisms of IAS 39 are related to its too prescriptive approach of what can and cannot qualify for hedge accounting.
Sign up for free to read the full articleRegister Login with LinkedIn
Already have an account?Login
Download our Free Treasury App for mobile and tablet to read articles – no log in required.Download Version Download Version