by Colin Digby, Head of Treasury Solutions and Markets, EMEA, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank
SWIFT’s corporate model is now, more than ever before, a realistic option for a lot of corporates considering a bank agnostic connectivity model. The associated costs (upfront and ongoing) and the process to implement a SWIFT solution are now a lot more appealing to many corporate treasurers. In addition to SWIFT doing their part in making this happen, banks are also taking a different attitude towards SWIFT for corporates; historically agnostic at best or lukewarm at worst, many are now embracing SWIFT more as simply another option in the armoury of connectivity models to support their diverse client base, rather than viewing SWIFT as any threat of disintermediation.
Even with many of the jigsaw pieces falling into place, it would appear that a considerable number of corporate treasurers have yet to fully grasp the SWIFT corporate approach and assess whether it could apply to their business model now or in the future. Admittedly this subject has been something of a moving target, as SWIFT’s corporate solution has evolved over the years. I am more convinced that the lack of clarity on this subject is based on a number of factors relating to the evolution of the various SWIFT corporate models over the years and the plethora of rules and standards that have changed with each generation. However, ultimately it has become an issue of perception. A perception of:
- SWIFT being an inter-bank club
- SWIFT equating to high levels of complexity & cost
- SWIFT requiring specialised knowledge
- SWIFT historically failing to establish a broadly appealing corporate model
MA-CUGs in effect became an entry point to SWIFT for corporates via a bank.
Whilst SWIFT achieved some initial success with its earliest corporate business models, signing up some of the largest corporates like General Electric, DuPont and Microsoft, the actual volume of clients and associated messages were modest. The SWIFT corporate models historically failed to deliver sufficient appeal and applicability to ever develop in to any real critical mass. But times have changed.
Sign up for free to read the full articleRegister Login with LinkedIn
Already have an account?Login
Download our Free Treasury App for mobile and tablet to read articles – no log in required.Download Version Download Version