Treasury Management Internation Logo
Treasury Strategy & Transformation
Published  7 MIN READ
Please note: this article is over 13 years old. If you feel this article is inaccurate or contains errors get in touch here. Many thanks, TMI

Pitfalls of Hedge Effectiveness Testing

by Jasper Wijnands, Advisor, Ernst & Young Financial Services Risk Management

Hedging can reduce the impact of negative events on assets, liabilities, firm commitments or forecasted transactions. Financial instruments in the market are used to offset the risk of any adverse price movements of the hedged item. Hedging will usually also limit the upside potential of positive events.

An important step when applying hedge accounting is the choice of a hedge effectiveness testing method.

It is preferable that the fair values of the hedged item and hedging instrument are accounted for in a similar manner on the balance sheet, as this will possibly decrease the volatility of the P&L. Therefore many companies will have to deal with hedge accounting to account for their hedge relationships, as fair values are then recorded in the same manner. Not all hedge relations, however, are qualified for the use of hedge accounting, as the hedge relationship should comply with several rules from the hedge accounting framework IAS 39.

One of the most important rules is that the hedge relation should be highly effective, for which testing is required. For hedge effectiveness testing various methods can be applied, resulting in different outcomes. With the chosen method, determined at inception of the hedge relationship, the hedge relationship must be tested periodically, on at least all reporting dates, until the end of the hedge relation. If in one of these tests the hedge relation is assessed as ineffective, hedge accounting is terminated as determined by IAS 39 and the result could be a large volatility of the P&L. Therefore, an important step when applying hedge accounting is the choice of a hedge effectiveness testing method.